Sep 21, 2005

Theory of parallel-human associations

With left, comes right, With right, comes wrong, With wronged, comes just, With just, comes, over, With over, comes under, With under, comes above, With above, comes grounded, With grounded, comes sky, With sky, comes earth, With earth, comes air, With air, comes water, With water, comes fire, With fire, comes elements.....

Sorry, a lame attempt to try to prove something. For everything, there is a parallel. Beauty, ugly. Rich, poor. Good, evil. Divine, unholy. Birth, death. Left, Right. Beginning, end. However, when things get to more abstract levels, they tend to get beyond human comprehension. I once heard a theory that we will never be able to under a 4D world, cos we live in a 3D world. Its like a dot would not understand what is a line, neither would a line understand what a solid is. We can never understand how the 4D world works.

Back to my thinkings... The notion of things having their negative parallel existence. It is only with the existence of one, will you have another. So, the negative parallel is as important as its positive parallel, as much as we deem the positivei parallel is important to us, while rejecting its negative.

I would like to draw your attention to the statement with beginning comes end, and link this statement to Time. How do we comprehend this? I draw parallel that from this, it is actually an expansion of the parallel theory, but the theory of ONE. If I do not remember wrongly, this is the ideology of Buddhist, that everything is one, everything is interconnected, and that everything affects everything else. The true classic example of a Butterfly effect? I would like to say that things are parallel but when interlinked in a way that will form the 'perfect' shape of the universe-Circle. With left, comes right. With front, comes back. With left, right, front, back, you have a circle ard you. Another idea would be come from the historical relationship that the Chinese scholars have place bwt Air, Earth, Water, Fire, Gold. Check it up youself if you do not know, but it forms a imperfect circular flow. Its not the shape, but the flow of things, that one leads to another. Look at the last lines of my 1st para. I tried to use some human associations.

Hereby, I have tones of crap from me, Cliff, aka KT Chew. Will anyone read all these? Leave some comments, so I will know who is so free, and such a nice friend ;)

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

mi mi mi!!!im such a nise fren n i read it!!!=) on ur lappie summore...heh...
~lai

Anonymous said...

hahaha...
an additional point...
a dot will not comprehend a line, a line will not comprehend a cube...however, a dot still is part of a line, and a line is still part of a cube...hence we are part of a 4D or even 5D world that we cannot percieve.. ^_^

read A wrinkle in time...haha..its a story book that somehow has those ideas in dere.. and btw..the 4th dimension is postulated to be Time, by physicists... ^_^

ta~

man